“As the Guardian’s Julian Borger recently reported (Iran nuclear talks: Settling for confusion in Baghdad, hoping for clarity in Moscow, May 29th) Iran and six of the world’s major powers agreed to settle on confusion at the latest round of negotiations in Baghdad and which adjourned on May 24th with no sign of progress.
The focal point of the talks was the international community’s call on Tehran to stop enriching uranium to 20 percent purity, which is a short technical step away from highly enriched uranium that can be weaponized.
The Iranians have responded with calls of their own for an immediate easing of the increasingly painful economic sanctions which have been imposed on them.
And so the endless whirling diplomatic pirouette continues; accompanied as always by rosy prognostications, fervent wishes and dramatic – albeit brief – flowerings of optimism. How long have Iranian and Western diplomats been filling their dance cards with high level quibbling on the issue of Tehran’s nuclear program?”
Click here for the answer, which appears as part of an essay posted on CiF Watch: http://cifwatch.com/2012/05/30/process-over-progress-wests-infatuation-with-buying-time-over-resolve-to-prevent-nuclear-iran/